The results below show the main ANOVA table, which tells us that the group (fetishistic, non-fetishistic or control group) had a significant effect on the time spent near the terrycloth object. To find out exactly what’s going on we can look at our post hoc tests and visualize the means by means of a Descriptives plot with confidence intervals. These results show that fetishistic quails spent significantly more time with the terrycloth than those in the other groups, and that fetishistic quails spent significantly more time with the terrycloth than the control group - fascinating!
For good measure we can also look at the Q-Q plot of the residuals. Most points are nicely located along the diagonal, so luckily that is one less worry for us (researching fetishistic quails is already worrisome enough on its own).
These results show that male quails have reduced copulatory efficiency (they are less efficient than those that don’t develop a fetish, but it’s worth remembering that they are no worse than quails that had no sexual conditioning – the controls). If you look at Labcoat Leni’s box then you’ll also see that this fetishistic behaviour may have evolved because the quails with fetishistic behaviour manage to fertilize a greater percentage of eggs (so their genes are passed on).
The Q-Q plot shows some deviations from normality though, so these results ought not to be taken 100% seriously (just in case you were still doing that).