The output shows that the main effect of `gender_identity` is significant, *F*(1, 36) = 7.292, *p* = 0.011, as is the main effect of film, *F*(1, 36) = 141.87, *p* < 0.001 and the interaction, *F*(1, 36) = 4.64, *p* = 0.038. Given that the interaction is significant we should focus on this effect (because it makes the main effects hard to interpret by themselves). To dissect the interaction effect we can look at the conditional post hoc tests for the interaction effect, which shows gender differences, for each of the two films separately. Psychological arousal is statistically comparable for those identifying as men and women during the documentary about notebooks (it is low for both genders), *t*(36) = 0.39, ptukey = 0.702, d = 0.172. However, for the notebook those identifying as men experienced significantly greater psychological arousal than those identifying as women, *t*(36) = 11.78, ptukey = 0.002, d = 1.535. These results are visualized in the raincloud and descriptives plots.