Infidelity | Commitment | ConsumptionLn | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valid | 240 | 239 | 240 | ||||
Missing | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Mean | 0.304 | 4.143 | 0.126 | ||||
Std. Deviation | 0.699 | 0.738 | 0.222 | ||||
Minimum | 0.000 | 1.750 | 0.000 | ||||
Maximum | 2.000 | 5.000 | 0.845 | ||||
AIC | BIC | Log-likelihood | n | df | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | 976.180 | 997.039 | -482.090 | 239 | 0 | ||||||
R² | |||
---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | |||
Infidelity | 0.114 | ||
Commitment | 0.020 | ||
Important : Parameter estimates can only be interpreted as causal effects if all confounding effects are accounted for and if the causal effect directions are correctly specified.
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | z-value | p | Lower | Upper | Std. Estimate | |||||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.457 | 0.246 | 1.862 | 0.063 | -0.024 | 0.939 | 0.145 | ||||||||||
Commitment | → | Infidelity | -0.271 | 0.071 | -3.810 | < .001 | -0.410 | -0.132 | -0.285 | ||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Commitment | -0.470 | 0.229 | -2.052 | 0.040 | -0.918 | -0.021 | -0.142 | ||||||||||
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | z-value | p | Lower | Upper | Std. Estimate | |||||||||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.457 | 0.246 | 1.862 | 0.063 | -0.024 | 0.939 | 0.145 | ||||||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Commitment | → | Infidelity | 0.127 | 0.068 | 1.874 | 0.061 | -0.006 | 0.260 | 0.040 | ||||||||||||
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | z-value | p | Lower | Upper | Std. Estimate | |||||||||||||||
Total | ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.585 | 0.244 | 2.399 | 0.016 | 0.107 | 1.062 | 0.186 | |||||||||||
Total indirect | ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.127 | 0.068 | 1.874 | 0.061 | -0.006 | 0.260 | 0.040 | |||||||||||
AIC | BIC | Log-likelihood | n | df | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | 976.180 | 997.039 | -482.090 | 239 | 0 | ||||||
Important : Parameter estimates can only be interpreted as causal effects if all confounding effects are accounted for and if the causal effect directions are correctly specified.
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | z-value | p | Lower | Upper | ||||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.457 | 0.246 | 1.862 | 0.063 | -0.024 | 0.939 | |||||||||
Commitment | → | Infidelity | -0.271 | 0.071 | -3.810 | < .001 | -0.410 | -0.132 | |||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Commitment | -0.470 | 0.229 | -2.052 | 0.040 | -0.918 | -0.021 | |||||||||
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | z-value | p | Lower | Upper | ||||||||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.457 | 0.246 | 1.862 | 0.063 | -0.024 | 0.939 | |||||||||||||
ConsumptionLn | → | Commitment | → | Infidelity | 0.127 | 0.068 | 1.874 | 0.061 | -0.006 | 0.260 | |||||||||||
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Std. Error | z-value | p | Lower | Upper | ||||||||||||||
Total | ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.585 | 0.244 | 2.399 | 0.016 | 0.107 | 1.062 | ||||||||||
Total indirect | ConsumptionLn | → | Infidelity | 0.127 | 0.068 | 1.874 | 0.061 | -0.006 | 0.260 | ||||||||||